Insights & Commentary
Applied-for mark ““CALCIUM GREEN D3&K2-MK7 ME&BE, figure”” is being opposed
25/11/2022
Grounds: Article 28 and 73.5 IP Law; Point 39.12.a(iv) Circular 01/2007/TT-BKHCN
Applied-for mark “PONDA TEA..., design of a panda bear” is being opposed
22/11/2022
Grounds: Article 74.2(e) and 112, IP Law.
Applied-for mark “FIZER” is opposed as filed in bad faith
19/11/2022
Grounds: Article 74.2(e) IP Law; Article 3.3, the Civil Code
A request to invalidate the marks “Plus TPBANK, figure”, “FreeGo, figure” was rejected.
09/07/2022
Grounds: Article 74.2(e), Article 96.1(b), IP Law; Article 17.1 Decree 103/2006/ND-CP
A request to invalidate trademark “GW, figure” was rejected
06/07/2022
Grounds: Articles 74.2.(a),(e) and 96.1(b), IP Law
Applied-for mark “COCOGROUP..., figure” is being opposed
01/06/2022
Grounds: Article 74.2(e), IP Law.
Trademark case: "PHARMANEX" vs. "PHARMATEX"
02/12/2021
Issue here regarding asessment of distinctiveness of word marks containing common prefixes for pharmaceutical products
“CYZ” vs. “SYZ, figure”
26/08/2021
Applied-for mark “CYZ” was rejected on the grounds that it’s confusingly similar to the cited trademark “SYZ, figure”...
The mark “n03” is accepted for registration
04/06/2021
The mark “n03” of International application no.1027797 designating Vietnam was temporarily rejected on the grounds that the mark consists of simple numerals, letters that are indistinctive.
LEGAL GUIDE ON TRADEMARKS IN VIETNAM
27/04/2021
PHAM & ASSOCIATES