Topics & Commentary
Applied-for mark " K YAKARA, hình " is being partially opposed.
26/11/2022
Grounds: Art. 74.2(e) and 112, IP Law
Applied-for mark ““CALCIUM GREEN D3&K2-MK7 ME&BE, figure”” is being opposed
25/11/2022
Grounds: Article 28 and 73.5 IP Law; Point 39.12.a(iv) Circular 01/2007/TT-BKHCN
Applied-for mark “PONDA TEA..., design of a panda bear” is being opposed
22/11/2022
Grounds: Article 74.2(e) and 112, IP Law.
Applied-for mark “FIZER” is opposed as filed in bad faith
19/11/2022
Grounds: Article 74.2(e) IP Law; Article 3.3, the Civil Code
A request to invalidate the marks “Plus TPBANK, figure”, “FreeGo, figure” was rejected.
09/07/2022
Grounds: Article 74.2(e), Article 96.1(b), IP Law; Article 17.1 Decree 103/2006/ND-CP
A request to invalidate trademark “GW, figure” was rejected
06/07/2022
Grounds: Articles 74.2.(a),(e) and 96.1(b), IP Law
Applied-for mark “COCOGROUP..., figure” is being opposed
01/06/2022
Grounds: Article 74.2(e), IP Law.
Trademark case: "PHARMANEX" vs. "PHARMATEX"
02/12/2021
Issue here regarding asessment of distinctiveness of word marks containing common prefixes for pharmaceutical products
“CYZ” vs. “SYZ, figure”
26/08/2021
Applied-for mark “CYZ” was rejected on the grounds that it’s confusingly similar to the cited trademark “SYZ, figure”...