Featured Practices
“AMERICAN LEGEND, figure” vs. “FORT LEGEND, figure”
29/06/2022
Grounds: Article 74.2(e) and 112, IP Law
The request for invalidation of the trademark “MUMMUM” has been rejected
22/06/2022
Grounds: Article 74.2 (e); Article 96.1 (b) of IP Law; Point 39.9(b) Circular No. 01/2007/BKHCN.
Requests for invalidation of marks “ - - wax on - -, picture ' were rejected
17/06/2022
Grounds: Clauses 1 and 3, Article 96, IP Law
Figurative element of applied-for mark "Ding Phong, figure of light-rays " is opposed
09/06/2022
Grounds: Article 74.2(e) and 112, IP Law
Applied-for mark “COCOGROUP..., figure” is being opposed
01/06/2022
Grounds: Article 74.2(e), IP Law.
Complex mark “BEEKEI L 30...,figure” is proposed to be invalidated
26/05/2022
Ground: Articles 87.7, 96.1(a), 96.3, the IP Law; Article 3.3 of the Civil Code 91/2015/QH13 and Article 6septies of the Paris Convention.
Applied-for mark "O FRODO, figure" is being opposed
19/05/2022
Ground: Article 27.2(b,c); 73.5 of the IP Law and Point 39.12.a(iv) of Circular 01/2007/TT-BKHCN
