Applied-for mark “PEAK PILATES” for products/services in Classes, 09, 28 and 41 was rejected for registration on the ground of describing the goods/services in respect of which the registration is sought...
In Circular 19/2019/TT-BKHCN of December 11, 2019, the Ministry of Science and Technology regulates the time limit for preserving IP dossiers and documents...
The applied-for mark “THE GRAND HO TRAM STRIP, figure” of Application no. 4-2013- 11207 was denied protection on the ground of being confusingly similar to the cited trademarks "GRAND", "P Grand, figure", "Grand Hotel", "Grand, figure"...
Forty-eight firms from 19 Asia-Pacific jurisdictions took home trophies at the 10th annual Asia IP Awards, held November 8 at the Shangri-La’s Far Eastern Plaza Hotel in Taipei.
The applied-for mark “CAMBRIDGE CORE” under the Intl’ Application no.1272293 for goods/services in Classes 09, 16, 35, 38 and 41 was rejected by the NOIP’s on the grounds that (i) the word element “CORE” is descriptive of the goods/services and (ii) the word element “CAMBRIDGE” is confusingly similar with the cited ...
The applied-for mark “DIVERSEY” of JohnsonDiversey, Inc. for goods in the Classes 01, 03, 05, 07 and 21 was rejected on the ground of being confusingly similar with the cited mark “DIVERSE”, Intl’ Reg. no.194398 of ETOS S.A.
The applied-for mark "ROBINSONS Fruit Shoot, Figure" under the Intl’ Application no.1244020 to be registered for goods in Class 32 has been provisionally rejected by NOIP on the ground of similarity with cited marks: "ROBINSON", "ROBINSONS", “R ROBINSONS, Figure”...